|
MISSION In 2016, the National CyberWatch Center Curriculum Standards Panel was established. The mission is to identify the learning objectives, concepts, procedures, situational judgments, and intellective abilities required to develop capabilities maturity in cybersecurity foundational principles, techniques, tactics, and protocols. The standards produced by the Curriculum Standards Panel are the first to align instructional design, skill practice facilities, cybersecurity professional job performance standards, national workforce frameworks, and industry needs. |
CYBERSECURITY CORE CURRICILUM MAPPING PROJECT The first project of the Curriculum Standards Panel was the Cybersecurity Core Curriculum Mapping Project. This project involved eight online working sessions with synchronous and asynchronous activities, involving over 100 faculty, industry professionals, and government representatives completing various tasks to determine the requirements for successfully completing five National CyberWatch Center courses: |
A COMPETENCY-BASED MASTERY LEARNING (CBML) CIRRICULUM
In 2017, the Curriculum Standards Panel architecture and mission was extended to develop course-specific standards panels to advance the models of instructional design used in cybersecurity education. The goal of this project was for each standards panel to develop a competency-based, mastery learning (CBML) curriculum library for one course.
The project (which ran from April 22, 2017 to April 22, 2018), funded by a grant (#H98230-17-1-0287) from the National Security Agency, applied psychometrically valid, competency-based instructional design techniques to develop the model domain taxonomy, assessment items, instructional content, and the sequencing plan for that content necessary to overcome constraints to achieving mastery of the National CyberWatch Information Security Fundamentals course (NCC 210).
A COMPETENCY-BASED MASTERY LEARNING (CBML) CIRRICULUM AND CAREER PATHWAYS The figure above was an outgrowth of two previous research projects: First, in 2016-2017, the initial Curriculum Standards Panel Cybersecurity Core Curriculum Mapping Project produced a mapping of National CyberWatch’s curriculum to various National Workforce Competency Frameworks. Second, in 2018, the original curriculum model was modified based on a study of the five-year history of the Community College Cyber Summit (3CS) to more accurately position the National CyberWatch Information Security Fundamentals course (NCC 210) as the gateway between the four Cyber Foundation Series courses (NCC 200, 204, 206 and 212) and the cybersecurity specialty pathways shown in the top of the diagram above (e.g., Operate and Maintain). The results of these efforts identified curriculum pathways that must be mastered to enable higher education graduates and members of the existing IT workforce to raise their cybersecurity maturity through the centrally important NCC 210 course. Upon mastery of the fundamental capabilities taught in NCC 210, a learner is ready to begin learning cybersecurity specialties. Each specialty prepares the learner for careers in one of the seven NICE Cybersecurity Workforce Framework Specialty Areas. |
CYBERSECURITY FOUNDATION SERIES - LEARNING MATERIALS In 2018, the Curriculum Standards Panel, with over 140 volunteers from academia, industry, and government, determined seven threshold Learning Objectives for the National CyberWatch Information Security Fundamentals course (NCC 210), the first in the Cyber Foundation Certificate, used as the basis for creating the first set of learning materials for the instructional library. The Learning Objectives and underlying concepts/topics were aligned with the primary Functions from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, as well as the Categories and Specialty Areas identified in the NICE Cybersecurity Workforce Framework. The goals for this effort included four outcomes:
For more information, see the Cybersecurity Foundations Series Overview (.PDF). |
CONTRBUTING AUTHORS
|
|
|